“This static condition of the image is the one that directly connects the audiovisual to the painting and, therefore, prime condition of the plastic contemplation in times of a different psychological nature.” (From Audiovisual Theory).
What within the audiovisual media is referred to the static image of plastic nature in this way screened, backdrop after backdrop, obtains its physical and living replacement in the architectural contemplation corresponding to each and every one of the places referred to in an itinerary: the different connected architectural rooms. This is also due to the action, development and ending principle, according to an expression of time equally united in both the audiovisual and the cinema.
Similarly to vital modules that are constantly united in the audiovisual, although not as memories condensation but in a present aesthetic time, pursuing the same unique and joint aim, “…then appear as successive shines in the darkness, as ‘If a spectator wandered unrestingly through the halls of a vast museum or great art gallery, at the dead of night, with a single small lamp in one hand, each of the natural objects, the pictured scenes, the status, the portraits, would be illumined by that lamp in succession for a single moment, while all the rest were in darkness, and after that single moment would fall into darkness again’ (*). The representation of audiovisuals, under these aesthetic conditions, is the addition of experiences in a line or succession aimed at attaining and individuality, as yet another stream of change within the “invariable intelligence of the absolute”. (From Audiovisual Work. Iconographic Selection).